Recently, I dreamt of falling water and gently
swaying scarves and weavers who crafted magical cloth. I dreamt of dancing,
silver bracelets shimmering on my arms, and resting on a mystical shore used
for healing sleep. And for the first time in what seems like forever, I sat
down yesterday and spent a few hours writing in my poetry journal. I now have
the seed of an idea for a new poetry chapbook.
For a long time, I’ve puzzled over why I’ve been
struggling with writing poetry. I don’t want to poo-poo the idea that learning
difficult things is valuable. There is a great value in learning something that
requires time, study, scholarship and devotion. But isn’t the point of all that
said scholarship to then to take it into the greater world and share it for the
good of others? Or to put it to some sort of practical use? There is much
lamenting in the poetry world about how no one reads poetry. Yet poets by and large
have spent a lot of time in narrow enclaves, writing for each other in a
specific, learned language that isn’t interesting or accessible to the general
public. By the time I stepped away from poetry to focus on writing my novel, I
was worried that I would begin to cement that same language, with its inscrutable trends and impenetrable aura, into my own poetry. Writing poetry felt
constricting rather than expansive; anxiety-producing rather than joyous.
Is poetry to be hoarded amongst those who can
devote their lives to its mysteries-- something holy to be gate-kept by a few high-appointed
guardians? Or do we as poets have a responsibility to ensure its ideas and joys
are shareable to a wider audience? I guess the answer to that conundrum lies in
what one believes the function of poetry is, or if you even believe it needs a function
beyond itself. Personally, I believe all art should be functional to some
degree or another, but I’m sure greater minds than mine would disagree. If the
role of the poet is to experiment with language and push boundaries, then is
the sacrifice inevitably accessibility? Then again, isn’t the ultimate point of
language communication? And why am I wasting my time and my readers time ruminating
on these questions when all I really want to do is write a game review for the
vintage “Vampire: The Masquerade?” I don’t have any answers. I just want to see
if it’s possible to write poetry that would appeal to people who would normally
never read poetry. Anyone with actual intellectual depth, please feel free to weigh in. Two paragraphs of this and I’m
already mentally exhausted. (A PhD in the making I am not.)
Also, “Vampires: The Masquerade” is a really good game, ya’ll. Almost 14
years old now, and it still holds up swimmingly. I’ll post a review next week.
In the meantime, speaking of vintage, here’s an oldie but a goodie by Edie
Brickell and the New Bohemians:
--Kristen McHenry
4 comments:
"Yet poets by and large have spent a lot of time in narrow enclaves, writing for each other in a specific, learned language that isn’t interesting or accessible to the general public."
I'm a poet and I've struggled with this very thing. While I don't have answers, reading your perspective provides a great sense of relief — I'm not alone! Thank you.
Another awesome post from Kristen!
Thank you, Drew! No, you are not alone. Keep writing and always stand for your own voice.
Thanks, John! :)
Post a Comment